CASPIAN SEA ENERGY BASIN
1.
Introduction
After
the disintegration of the former Soviet Union in 1990, the Russian Federation
has politically lost its own influence over the Caspian Sea energy basin. In the
meantime the international oil companies have found an incredible opportunity of
preparing and implementing their commercial projects on the exploitation and
then transportation of natural resources of the region to the world market. In
fact they have made huge amount of investments. Total value of their investments
in terms of US dollars is nearly
37 or 42 billion dollars.
Due
to newly emerged development, most of the states, who have urgently needed the
natural resources, have turned their eyes on the resources and changed their
foreign policies in favor of “energy” and “global cooperation”. For
example, today Iran and the United States have made serious diplomatic attempts
to put an end to bilateral conflicts. The United States have signed various
agreements with the European Union and China on the subjects of energy,
political cooperation, global economic affairs and global security. Meanwhile
they have begun to establish close economic, diplomatic, political and
commercial relations with the Central Asian and the Caucasus states in order to
freely import the regional resources and to operate in these states’ markets.
Of
course in order to understand real meaning of radical changes in the foreign
policies of the states as well as bilateral and multilateral relations among
them, we should briefly give information about the Caspian Sea reserves and the
pipeline projects.
Before
dealing with the details, in this study, total natural gas and oil reserves of
Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan will be given because they
are littoral states of the Caspian Sea.
During
the former Soviet Union period, “Turkistan region”, including both Caspian
Sea region and other Turkish areas, had contained nearly 32 percent of all
former Soviet Union’s oil reserves and 50 percent of its natural gas reserves.
According
to the report, named “Caspian Sea Region”, prepared by the US Energy
Information Administration in December 1998, in the Caspian Sea region,
Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan have nearly 161 or 178
billion barrels oil and 553 or 654 trillion cubic feet natural gas reserves.
(See Table 1 and Table 2) Total amount of proven oil reserves is 15.6 or 32.1
billion barrels. Possible oil reserves are ten times more than that of the
proven oil reserves, which is nearly 145 billion barrels.
If
we look at Table 2, total amount of proven natural gas reserves is 236 or 337
trillion cubic feet. In the
meantime they have 317 trillion cubic feet possible natural gas reserves.
When
we compare oil reserves of the Caspian Sea region with the North Sea and the
United States, we can easily say these reserves are more than these two regions.
A total oil reserve of the United States is 22 billion barrels and that of the
North Sea is 17 billion barrels. Based upon proven natural gas reserves,
Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan each rank among the world’s twenty
largest natural gas producer countries.
In
order to understand importance of the regional resources, we should indicate
their values in terms of US dollars. If we assume that one-barrel oil price is
25 dollars. So total value of oil reserves, including both proven (390 or 811.5
billion dollars) and possible ones (3 trillion 625 billion dollars), in terms of
US dollars is nearly 4 trillion or 4 trillion 436 billion dollars. (See Table 3)
When
we accept that the price of one-thousand cubic meters natural gas is 40 dollars,
total value of natural gas reserves, including proven gas reserves (539.42 or
770.28 billion dollars) and possible gas reserves (724.57 billion dollars), is 1
trillion 264 billion dollars or 1 trillion 494 billion dollars. Consequently the
total value of oil and natural gas reserve is nearly 5 trillion 264 billion
dollars or 5 trillion 930 billion dollars.
In
1991, gross energy consumption in the world amounted to 8,324 million tons of
oil equivalent. But according to the studies, the world consumption will rise by
nearly 1.8 percent on an annual basis in the industrialized countries. However
energy growth in Asia is expected to reach an average of 4.3 percent per a year.
Within
the framework of the scientific calculations, by 2015, total worldwide demand
for oil is expected to reach approximately 103 million barrels per a day. It is
estimated that nearly 25 or 28 million barrels per a day. On the other hand the
Western Europe will need approximately 15 or 18 barrels per a day.
As
far as China’s energy demand is concerned, recent estimation of Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation Organization suggests that China’s net external energy
requirements will rise to over one million barrel per a day in 2000 and three
millions barrels per a day by 2010.
In
matter of the natural gas, the Western countries have needed approximately 456
billion cubic meters natural gas per a year by 2020. Nearly 251 billion cubic
meters of natural gas will be imported from outside. On the other hand it is
estimated that annual natural gas demand of Turkey is 80 billion cubic meters in
2020.
With
its own oil reserves, including proven and possible reserves, from 2015, the
Caspian Sea region can itself supply the Asian countries’ oil demands for
period of 18 or 20 years; and those of the Western Europe for 30 or 33 years.
These
scientific studies and estimations have overtly confirmed that not only the
western but also the eastern states have clearly and urgently needed the natural
gas and oil reserves of the Caspian Sea region for their own industrial
infrastructure.
At
the same time in order to transfer sufficient amount of the natural resources,
new transportation routes have immediately been necessary. The existing
pipelines in the Caspian Sea region were designed to link the Soviet Union
internally and were rested through the Russian Federation. Now existing oil and
natural gas pipelines do not have enough capacity to absorb or export the
natural resources of the region to the world market.
4.1.
Options for Pipelines
There
are many seven different routes for the pipelines. China, Georgia, the Persian
Gulf, Iran, Pakistan, the Russian Federation and Turkey.
4.1.1. China
4.1.1.1.
Natural Gas
The multinational oil companies have prepared two projects. American Exxon, Japan Mitsubishi and China National Petroleum have jointly submitted a preliminary feasibility study for the construction of the world’s largest natural gas pipeline from East Turkmenistan through Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan to the Chinese coast and South Korea and will end in Japan. Length of the pipeline from Turkmenistan to China is 5,730 kilometers; from China to South Korea, 650 kilometers; and from South Korea to Japan, 1,660 kilometers. Total capital investment is estimated at nearly 11 billion US dollars. Its annual capacity is one trillion cubic feet.
4.1.1.2. Oil
A
feasibility study for an oil pipeline from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan to China
was prepared in 1999. Length of the pipeline is nearly 1,800 miles. Its cost is
estimated at nearly 3.5 billion dollars and its daily capacity is 400 thousands
or 800 thousands barrels. An agreement related to the pipeline project was
signed in 1997.
4.1.2.
Georgia
The
pipeline will transfer early Azeri oil from Baku to the Georgian port of Supsa
on the Black Sea. Total cost of the project is nearly 500 million dollars. The
consortium has prepared some projects to increase its daily capacity from 100
thousand barrels per a day to 300 thousand barrels per a day. Its length is 550
miles.
4.1.3.
The Persian Gulf
4.1.3.1.
Oil
Kazakhstan
signed an agreement in 1996 to transfer its oil to the Caspian Sea port of Iran
with the Iranian government. After that Iran, through using existing pipelines,
by rail, will transform the Kazakh oil to its Persian Gulf ports. Monument Oil
and Gas Company has engaged in the process. Total volumes from Kazakhstan have
been 30 thousands or 40 thousands barrels per a day.
Turkmenistan
authorized Total in October 1998 to conduct a feasibility study for an oil
pipeline that would transfer Kazakh and Turkmen oil from the Tengiz and Novy
Uzen oil fields in Kazakhstan via the Balkan Velayat of Turkmenistan to the
Iranian Persian Gulf ports. The proposed pipeline would carry 500 thousand or 1
million barrel Kazakh and Turkmen oil. With respect to the pipeline
Turkmenistan, Iran and Kazakhstan have signed a Memorandum. They agreed on that
they would transfer that amount of oil to European, Asian or South African
markets depending on market situation. The cost was estimated at nearly 2
billion dollars for 500 thousand barrels day pipeline to Tehran. Kazakhstan
Pipeline Company estimated at 1.6 billion dollars for 900 million barrels per a
day pipeline to Persian Gulf. Length of the pipeline from Tengiz to Tehran is
1,060 miles; from Kazakhstan to Persian Gulf is 1,300 miles.
Iran
has also proposed that Azerbaijan might use an alternative route for the Baku
– Ceyhan pipeline that would pass from Azerbaijan to Turkey via northwestern
Iran. But the Azerbaijani Milli Majlis rejected the proposal in November 1998.
4.1.3.2.
Natural Gas
In
December 1997, Turkmenistan and Iran jointly constructed an export pipeline for
natural gas of Turkmenistan from Korpedge to Kord-Kui. Export volume of the
pipeline is 70 billion cubic feet. Within ten years they will increase its
capacity to 350 billion cubic feet annually.
In
the same year, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Iran signed an agreement on the
construction of natural gas pipeline from West Turkmenistan to Turkey via Iran.
In May 1997, they signed a Memorandum. French Sofregas completed first
feasibility study for the gas pipeline in 1997. Shell Company prepared another
feasibility. After the feasibility
report, Iran and Turkey signed Memorandums of Mutual Understanding. They also
signed related official documents for establishing the Consortium, Purchasing,
Selling and Transiting the Turkmen gas. Length of the route to Turkish –
Bulgarian border is 3,900 kilometers. Total cost is estimated at 7,6 billion
dollars. Its capacity is 22,5 billion cubic meters in 2005 and 30 billion cubic
meters in 2010.
4.1.4.
Pakistan
4.1.4.1.
Natural Gas
In
May 1996, the governments of Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan
signed a Memorandum of Mutual Understanding for the construction of Centgas
(Central Gas Pipeline). In October 1997, an agreement was signed for the
establishment of Consortium with the Unocal Corporation, Inpex, Krescent and
Hyundai. Although Bridas discovered sufficient natural gas reserves in Yaslar
area and Unocal / Delta leadership prepared positive feasibility report, Unocal
announced that it was suspending its work on the pipelines. In December 1998 it
withdrew from the Consortium and put an end to its own commercial activities in
Turkmenistan. It was due to the ongoing civil war in Afghanistan and US bombings
on Afghanistan.
The
pipeline would transfer Turkmen natural gas from Dovletabad – Donmez field to
town of Multan in Pakistan via Afghanistan. Its length is 1,464 kilometers. The
Consortium estimated its cost at 2 billion dollars. Its annual capacity is 15
billion cubic meters.
4.1.4.2.Oil
The
Central Asian Pipeline project envisions construction and operation of an export
pipeline and marine shipping terminal. By early 1999, a Memorandum of Mutual
Understanding among Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan was signed. Its
length is 1,667 kilometers. It will end the marine shipping terminal on
Pakistan’s coast of the Arabian Sea passing through the territories of
Afghanistan and Pakistan. Its annual capacity is 50 million tonnes. Its
construction cost is estimated at 2.7 billion dollars.
4.1.5.
Russia
4.1.5.1.
Oil
The
Caspian Pipeline Consortium will transport Kazakh oil from Tengiz –
Novorossiik route to the world market. The CPC has refurbished an existing
pipeline from Tengiz to the Astrakhan region. In the meantime it has constructed
a new pipeline from the Astrakhan region to the Black Sea port of Novorossiik.
Shareholders of the Consortium have expected to make the pipeline operational in
2001. Its capacity is 1,34 million barrels oil per a day. Its length is 930
miles. Its cost is estimated at 2.3 billion dollars. In November 1998, the
Russian Parliament approved the CPC construction plan.
In
the same period, the Russian Federation presented a proposal to the Turkmen
officials for transporting its oil via Russian territory to the world market.
According to the Russian Transport Ministry’s proposal, the Russian Federation
will ship Turkmen oil via tanker from Turkmenbashi city in Turkmenistan to the
Russian ports on the Caspian Sea. From there it will be shipped via rail to the
Black Sea.
The
Russian Federation had also wanted to carry on the transportation of the Azeri
oil from Baku to the Black Sea through using the existing pipeline via Grozny,
Chechnya. Due to the internal conflicts between Chechnya and the Russian
Federation, the Russian officials prepared new projects that bypass Chechnya.
Daily capacity of the pipeline is 0.6 million barrels. Total cost of the
pipeline is estimated at 1.2 or 1.5 billion dollars. In order to bypass
Chechnya, the Russian Federation has planned to build 176 mile-long new
pipelines from Baku to the Russian Federation.
4.1.5.2.
Natural Gas
The
existing Russian pipeline system could be repaired and expanded to allow the
Central Asian states to export further natural gas resources to the Western
Europe through the Russian territory. Due to the debts of the former Soviet
Union Republics, especially Ukraine, Georgia and Armenia, the Northern route was
not efficiently operational after 1990. Turkmenistan and the Russian Federation
lived some conflicts on the matters of price of the natural gas and its
payments. Therefore in 1997 Turkmenistan cut off the Northern pipeline. Thus it
was deprived from huge amount of the natural gas revenues, amounted to nearly
one billion dollar. After that they signed an agreement on selling the natural
gas. Nowadays the Russian Federation has negotiated with Turkmenistan on a
natural gas deal. The Russian Federation has expressed its intention to buy
annually fifty billion cubic meters natural gas from Turkmenistan.
On
the other hand the Russian Federation has intended to construct a new natural
gas pipeline to Turkey via Georgia. They
have planned to build a new gas pipeline from Georgia to Turkey.
Lastly
Turkey and the Russian Federation have made great attempts to finalize the Blue
Stream project. The project will transfer the natural gas under the Black Sea
from Dzhubga to Samsun. Russian Gazprom and Italian ENI have jointly constructed
the Russian side. Its capacity is annually 16 billion cubic meters. Its cost is
estimated at 2 billion dollars. Although it lived a financial difficulty for a
long time, Italian and German financial institutions finance mostly the project.
In
December 1997, Turkey signed an agreement with the Russian Federation to buy
annually all amount of the natural gas transferred by the Blue Stream project.
When Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit visited Moscow, the parties signed an
additional protocol to complete the project.
4.1.6.
Turkey
4.1.6.1.Oil
International
oil companies have planned to transfer Azeri, Turkmen and Kazakhs oil reserves
from Baku to Ceyhan via Georgia. Kazakh and Turkmen oil will be shipped from
their Caspian coasts to Baku. In October 1998, related parties signed the Ankara
Declaration, which affirmed their political support for Baku – Ceyhan oil
pipeline. The governments of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazkahstan, Turkey and
Uzbekistan signed the Declaration. Firstly Azerbaijan International Oil
Consortium (AIOC) put forward its own objections against the project. According
to the AIOC, the pipeline was not economically viable. Upon the US support in
1999, they selected the Baku – Ceyhan route as a main route that will transfer
the Caspian oil to the world market.
4.1.6.2.
Natural Gas
In
1998, the US Administration put forward the Trans-Caspian natural gas pipeline
project as an alternative route to the northern route. The pipeline route
originates in Western Turkmenistan, runs on the bed of the Caspian Sea and then
via Azerbaijan and Georgia and continues in Turkey. Its overall length is nearly
2,000 kilometers. The project’s cost is estimated at 2 billion dollars. Annual
capacity of the gas pipeline will reach to 30 billion cubic meters. Turkey will
annually buy 16 million cubic meters.
In
January 1999, Enron (USA) submitted results of its marketing study for Turkmen
gas and the feasibility study. In October 1998, Turkey and Turkmenistan signed
an agreement on the sale of Turkmen gas. In March 1999, PSG, based in London,
became the leader of the Consortium. The Consortium partners have spent great
efforts to complete the Transit Agreements with Azerbaijan and Georgia. In the
same year, a new natural gas reserve in the Caspian Sea Azerbaijani part was
discovered. Thus Azerbaijan has wanted to transfer its own natural gas through
the Trans-Caspian pipeline. Still they have carried on the negotiations to find
a final understanding among themselves.
5.
Expectations of the Regional Countries from the Pipeline Projects
5.1.Strengthening
Their Economic Prosperity and Political Independence
During
the Soviet Union period, there was a strict interconnected economic system among
the former Soviet Republics. Therefore each Republic was absolutely dependent
upon other Republic’s industrial infrastructure and it should adapt its
economic development plans to the Moscow’s five-year economic programs. For
example, Turkmenistan exported its oil and natural gas resources to other former
Soviet Republics through Central Asia – Center Pipeline. Thus from thus
operation it took money from Moscow.
However
when the Central Asian countries gained their independence, only the northern
route was operational. Therefore they should carry on to transfer their
resources to the Russian Federation in order to gain revenues. Otherwise they
would not earn money that was vitally necessary for the survival of their
economies. Thus as of economic vulnerability of them, they could not make
independently their economic development programs. In the meantime the Russian
Federation has used the existing pipeline network as an instrument to manipulate
their political behaviors. Thus they did not have full political independence,
which was under the control of the Russian Federation.
When
they have constructed various pipelines with the help of the Western companies,
they will transfer their own natural resources to the world market without
direct Russian control. Thus they will become less dependent upon the Russian
industrial infrastructure as well as its economy. They can find a suitable
ground for preparing their economic development programs independently. They
will also catch an opportunity for pursuing independent foreign policies in
favor of their national interests. This situation will automatically weaken and
maybe abandon the Russian hegemony over the region. Thus they will gain their
full political independence and provide their economic prosperity.
5.2.
Putting an End to the Local Social Difficulties
In
1991, as a result of the disintegration of the former Soviet Union and as of the
interconnected economic system, the Central Asian states faced with terrible
economic difficulties. They did not have any manufactures goods, which would be
exported to the world markets, except their natural resources. Although they
continued to transfer their gas and oil reserves to other former Soviet Union
Republics through northern route, the Consumer Republics could not pay their
debts on the time. This is the handicap for their economies.
On
the other hand they should make huge amount of investments in order to
reorganize their internal economic infrastructure and to provide new job
opportunities to local people. Meanwhile in 1991s nobody could find any kind of
consumption goods, except basic consumption things. Therefore they should
produce the goods for local people and the manufactured goods such as textiles
to export and then to earn the money. Non-functional economic infrastructure,
lack of basic consumption goods and also high unemployment might lead to the
social difficulties.
Therefore
they should immediately transfer oil and gas reserves to the world market to
earn money. Thus they could make their economic infrastructure functional, to
provide new job opportunities for the local people and to pay higher salaries to
them. In their economies, oil and natural gas sectors are the leading sectors
and therefore have a very important place. For example, total amount of 1999
Turkmenistan’s budget was 22 trillion manats. 16 trillion manats of total
revenues came from these two leading sectors.
When
they earn huge amount of money from these sectors, they will spend them for
sustainable economic developments. Thus internal social conditions will become
much better and provide very comfortable life for the local people. Thus the
governments will prevent the emergence of social radical movements.
5.3.
Integrating
with the World Economic System
The
Central Asian and the Caucasian states have pursued more liberal and democratic
policies. They have encouraged the foreign companies to make investments in
their own territories. Thus they have made incredible attempts to transform
their state-controlled economic system to the liberal one. Even they have
adopted suitable laws that have given some guarantees to the foreign investors.
As a result of their attempts, firstly international oil companies will begin to
operate in their economies and make huge amount of investments. Other foreign
companies will follow their commercial activities. With the help of foreign
companies, they will automatically integrate with regional and world economic
systems. Finally they will become members of regional and international economic
organizations.
TABLES
Table
1: Oil Reserves (billion barrels)
|
Country |
Proven
Oil Reserves |
Possible
Oil Reserves |
Total
Oil Reserves |
Azerbaijan
|
3.6
– 12.5 |
27 |
31
– 40 |
|
Kazakhstan |
10
– 17.6 |
85 |
95
– 103 |
|
Turkmenistan |
1.7 |
32 |
34 |
|
Uzbekistan |
0.3 |
1 |
1 |
|
Total |
15.6
– 32.1 |
145 |
161
– 178 |
Source:
US Energy Information Administration, Caspian Sea Region, December 1998
Table
2: Natural Gas Reserves (trillion cubic feet)
|
Country |
Proven
Natural Gas Reserves |
Possible
Natural Gas Reserves |
Total
Natural Gas Reserves |
Azerbaijan
|
11 |
35 |
46 |
|
Kazakhstan |
53
– 83 |
88 |
141
– 171 |
|
Turkmenistan |
98
– 155 |
159 |
257
– 314 |
|
Uzbekistan |
74
– 88 |
35 |
109
– 123 |
Total
|
236
– 337 |
317 |
553
– 654 |
Source:
US Energy Information Administration, Caspian Sea Region, December 1998
Table
3: The Values of Oil Reserves in Terms of US Dollars (billion dollars)
|
Country |
Proven
Oil Reserves |
Value |
Possible
Oil Reserves |
Value |
|
Azerbaijan |
3.6
– 12.5 |
90
– 312.5 |
27 |
675 |
|
Turkmenistan |
1.7 |
42.5 |
32 |
800 |
|
Uzbekistan |
0.3 |
7.5 |
1 |
25 |
|
Kazakhstan |
10
– 17.6 |
250
- 440 |
85 |
2,125 |
|
Total |
15.6
– 32.1 |
390
– 811.5 |
145 |
3,625 |
Table
4: Value of Natural Gas Reserves in terms of US dollars (1.000 m3 = $ 40)
(billion dollars)
|
Country |
Proven
Gas Reserves |
Possible
Gas Reserves |
Total
Natural Gas Reserves |
|
Azerbaijan |
25.14 |
80 |
105.14 |
|
Kazakhstan |
121.16
– 189.72 |
201.14 |
322.30
– 390.86 |
|
Turkmenistan |
224
– 354.28 |
363.42 |
587.42
– 717.70 |
|
Uzbekistan |
169.12
– 201.14 |
80 |
249.12
– 281.14 |
|
Total |
539.42
– 770.28 |
724.57 |
1,264
– 1,494 |